*1: Drag(W)
*2: (Conventional product)
*3: Yaw angle(deg.)
Compared to the conventional product C40-TL, air resistance has been reduced at all yaw angles on C36-TL, which has about the same rim height. In the conversion method that considers the direction of the winds received under actual running conditions*, the drag has been reduced by about 3 W.
Of course, air resistance has been further reduced on both C50-TL and C60-HR-TL.
* Calculated by weighted averaging the air resistance values measured in wind tunnel tests with the wind direction ratio of the winds received during running. The wind direction ratio is obtained by actually measuring, with an ultrasonic anemometer, the direction of the winds received by a rider when traveling at a speed of around 48 km/h in an environment with a wind velocity of 3 to 5 m/s.
*1: Drag(W)
*2: (Conventional product)
*3: Yaw angle(deg.)
[Measurement conditions (Graph for wind tunnel tests)]
Value of air resistance generated at the front wheel alone
Wind velocity/wheel rotation speed: 48 km/h
Tire: Schwalbe Pro One TLE 25c
*1: Others aero shape rim
*2: SHIMANO D2 rim
*3: Others
*4: Watt
*5: SHIMANO
*6: Less air drag
*7: Yaw angle(degrees)
*1: D2 rim
*2: Other aero shape rim
*3: Effective in lateral winds
*4: Turbulent flow is generated(increased air drag)
*5: Fills the gap
*6: Smooth air flow
*7: Gap
*1: Headwind
*2: Lateral wind
*3: Yaw angle
*4: Resultant wind